Immunohistochemistry for Diagnosing Melanoma in Older Adults.

Importance: Pathologic assessment to diagnose skin biopsies, especially for cutaneous melanoma, can be challenging, and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining has the potential to aid decision-making. Currently, the temporal trends regarding the use of IHC for the examination of skin biopsies on a national level have not been described. Objective: To illustrate trends in the use of IHC for the examination of skin biopsies in melanoma diagnoses. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to examine incident cases of melanoma diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2017. The analysis used the SEER-Medicare linked database, incorporating data from 17 population-based registries. The study focused on incident cases of in situ or malignant melanoma of the skin diagnosed in patients 65 years or older. Data were analyzed between August 2022 and November 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes encompassed the identification of claims for IHC within the month of melanoma diagnoses and extending up to 14 days into the month following diagnosis. The SEER data on patients with melanoma comprised demographic, tumor, and area-level characteristics. Results: The final sample comprised 132 547 melanoma tumors in 116 117 distinct patients. Of the 132 547 melanoma diagnoses meeting inclusion criteria from 2000 to 2017, 43 396 cases had accompanying IHC claims (33%). Among these cases, 28 298 (65%) were diagnosed in male patients, 19 019 (44%) were diagnosed in patients aged 65 years to 74 years, 16 444 (38%) in patients aged 75 years to 84 years, and 7933 (18%) in patients aged 85 years and older. In 2000, 11% of melanoma cases had claims for IHC at or near the time of diagnosis. This proportion increased yearly, with 51% of melanoma cases having associated IHC claims in 2017. Increasing IHC use is observed for all stages of melanoma, including in situ melanoma. Claims for IHC in melanomas increased in all 17 SEER registries but at different rates. In 2017, the use of IHC for melanoma diagnosis ranged from 39% to 68% across registries. Conclusions and Relevance: Considering the dramatically rising and variable use of IHC in diagnosing melanoma by pathologists demonstrated in this retrospective cross-sectional study, further investigation is warranted to understand the clinical utility and discern when IHC most improves diagnostic accuracy or helps patients.

Capecitabine-induced Gastrointestinal Injury Shows a Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)-like Pattern.

Capecitabine is a commonly used oral chemotherapeutic agent. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects are clinically well-known, however, the histopathologic changes have not been comprehensively studied. This study describes the largest case series (8 patients) characterizing the histopathology of capecitabine-induced GI injury. All patients were adults (median age: 64.5 y, range: 61 to 76 y) and there was gender parity. Patients were receiving treatment for malignancies of the colorectum (n=5), breast (n=1), pancreas (n=1), and appendix (n=1). All had GI symptoms, including 7 with diarrhea and abdominal pain and 1 with melena. Five of 8 (63%) showed graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-like histologic changes in small intestinal and/or colonic biopsies characterized by crypt disarray and dropout, crypt atrophy, dilated crypts lined by attenuated epithelium, and increased crypt apoptosis. Neuroendocrine cell aggregates were present in 4 of 5 cases. Four of 5 showed patchy prominence in lamina propria eosinophils. One patient receiving concomitant radiation therapy had a small intestinal biopsy showing regenerative changes. Two patients had histologically unremarkable biopsies. On follow-up, capecitabine was discontinued or dose-reduced in all patients. Three of 5 patients with a GVHD-like pattern had clinical improvement, whereas 2 died shortly after biopsy. One with regenerative changes also had radiation dose reduction and improved clinically. Two with unremarkable biopsies improved symptomatically. In summary, capecitabine-related GI injury shows a GVHD-like pattern. Knowledge of this is important to confirm the diagnosis as patients typically improve with dose reduction or discontinuation of the drug.

Who is the Teacher and Who is the Student? The Dual Service- and Engaged-Learning Pedagogical Model of Anatomy Academy.

Anatomy Academy is a simultaneous service-learning experience for preprofessional school undergraduate students and preclinical professional students acting as classroom paraprofessional teachers (Mentors), and engaged-learning experience for fourth to sixth grade elementary school children (Students). Using didactic and kinesthetic active learning teaching strategies in small-group classroom environments, Mentors taught anatomy, physiology, and nutrition concepts to Students. In this study of the program's early years (2012-2014), overall objectives of improving Mentors' pedagogical confidence; and Students' science interest, science knowledge, and exercise self-efficacy were assessed. Mentors showed (89% response of 595 surveyed) improvement in content delivery (P < .001), student engagement (P < .001), classroom management (P < .001), and professionalism (P = .0001). Postprogram Mentor reflections were categorized into 7 major themes that demonstrated personal growth through the service-learning opportunity: (1) realization of an ability to make a difference in the world now; (2) acknowledgment of the importance of listening in teaching; (3) recognition that lives can and will change with "a little love"; (4) insight into the effectiveness of guiding Students through material rather than lecturing; (5) awareness of the value of respect in the learning environment; (6) cognizance of the power of individualized attention to motivate Students; and (7) reflection of one's own personal growth through the open influence of Students. Students showed (88% response of 1259 surveyed) improvement in science knowledge (P = .014) and exercise self-efficacy (P = .038), but not science interest (P = .371). Thus, while Students are learning more science and becoming more aware of their health, we need to be more overt in our presence as scientists in the educational arena.